There
has been some delay in publishing the newsletter for which we
apologize. Consider- able
time has been spent in careful review of the June 15, 2004 Watchtower
since this likely establishes official Watchtower policy on blood for
several years. As this time, we can inform you that we have published a
comprehensive response to the Watchtower study articles.
Medicine & Science
by Lee Elder
One of the more interesting developments over the past year is the
reaction of Jehovah's Witnesses and non Jehovah's Witnesses to the
testing and use of Polyheme. As you may have read, the FDA has approved
a study which will allow the oxygen carrying blood product (produced
from human red blood cells) to be administered at the scene of an
accident without the permission of the injured person.
This study is being conducted in selected cities to assess the efficacy
of hemoglobin based blood products and there has been room for public
comment in the cities selected for study. The news reports have shown
that a number of Jehovah's Witnesses have strongly objected and taken
steps to opt out of the study in advance.
Is this a case where the Jehovah's Witnesses in question understand the
new policy that permits the use of hemoglobin and object to it to the
point of speaking in the media? No - I don't believe so. It is highly
uncharacteristic for Witnesses to oppose Watchtower policy publicly.
What we have here is the result of the Watchtower Writing Department's
careful attempt to obfuscate the new policy. Both Jehovah's Witnesses
and medical professionals alike are confused by the mixed message the
Watchtower is sending. Note the following email we received from a
Jehovah's Witness:
Hi, I am
studying with Jehovah's Witnesses, I used to be one years and years
ago. I
am now an RN. I recently read the 6/15/04 article on blood and
have also
visited your website. You have a chart which actually adds to the
chart
in the 6/15/04 Watchtower article. In yours, you list hemoglobin
substitutes as acceptable to JW's. I don't see that in the
Watchtower
article and got on the Watchtower and Bible Tract Society website and
did not
see any such substitutes listed under alternatives. Your article
stating
they accepted hemoglobin substitutes interested me because hemoglobin
is a
major component of the red blood cell and actually allows the red blood
cell to
carry its oxygen. Without it, blood is no longer
life-giving. Where
did you get your information on hemoglobin-based blood substitutes
being
acceptable to Jehovah's Witnesses?
Here is an individual who has the added benefit of being a registered
nurse, has read the Watchtower's published statements and is still
unable to accurately assess just what the policy is!
One would think that by continuing to state policy in such an unclear
manner, the Watchtower Society is not only permitting confusion among
its members, it is promoting it. That such confusion and
misunderstanding will lead to the refusal of potentially life saving
transfusions of PolyHeme and other hemoglobin based blood products is
seems highly probable.
It is our sincere hope that the leadership of the Watchtower Society
will direct the writing department to publish very clear guidelines and
directives in this regard to clear up this confusion among Jehovah's
Witnesses. Respect for life demands nothing less.
Legal Developments
March 23, 2005
by Lawrence Hughes
I won the court hearing
yesterday. The attempt by the Watchtower Society to have portions of my
affidavit struck down was unsuccessful. Four days have been set
aside for
the next court
hearing - April 25- 28, 2005. This next hearing is
the BIG one. All the Watchtower lawyers from Canada
will be there either as defendants or representing defendants
including all the defendants and
Watchtower representatives involved in the case. If they succeed, my
lawsuit will be
thrown out. It is imperative that I get as many persons to support the
protest
rally as possible. The more persons at the rally, the more media
coverage. The
more media coverage, the more likely the Judge will decide in my favor
and
allow this lawsuit to go to trial. If this case goes to trial, it will
be the
most publicized trial in Canadian history.
I
am also organizing a
protest rally in Toronto in front of
the Ontario
Legislature Building,
Friday, June 24th from 12:00 noon until about 3:00 pm. The issues will
be about
the many Jehovah Witnesses dying each day regarding the Watchtower
Society's prohibition
on blood transfusions and on the protecting of pedophiles in the
organization.
I am
also having a protest rally
in Georgetown, Ontario, Saturday, June 25th at the
Watch- tower Society HQ from 12:00 noon to 3:00 pm. I do not expect
people to
support both. The protest at the Ontario Legislature is the more
important one.
It should get national, if not world news coverage.
Please let me know if
you
can attend. Please use the email address below for this and
feel free
to give it out to others. Thanks and please spread the word.
to_protest_rally@yahoo.ca
P.S.
- I will be conducting
a Memorial for those victims who died refusing blood transfusions.
Anyone who
has lost a loved one due to the WTS prohibition on blood can send me a
photo
with a write up of what happened, name, date, etc. for the memorial. It
would be
best if they could come in person and talk to the media.
Announcements and
Member Requests
From
AJWRB
members in Czechoslovakia:
We have prepared a new book about JW´s and blood in
Czech language. Its title is: “Life is sacred – Christians and the
question of blood in Bible”. The book consists about 230 pages
including info from AJWRB web site, life experiences and personal
expressions from Czech republic too. For example, a professor of
theology wrote one chapter, and the manager of a transfusion center and
doctor wrote other chapters.
We
want to publish 1000 copies at first edition. Target language group
comprises 42,000 of memorial attendance in Czech and Slovak republics.
(About 15 million peoples live in our countries.) The cost is going to
be about $2,500 We have raised two thousand dollars.
Can you support our
book by sending 500 dollars?
If you are interested in supporting this
effort, please contact us for additional instructions.
URGENT - I need an opinion from a Pediatric Oncologist. I need a
Pediatric Oncologist to quickly review some medical records and give an
opinion on whether blood transfusions would have allowed Bethany a
chance to live long enough to find a treatment that would have offered
her a chance to live. Also, if she had not received Arsenic Trioxide
would there have been a possibility that she would have survived.
Please send me contact information for an Oncologist A.S.A.P. Please email info to freechristian2002@yahoo.com.
Thanks - Lawrence
<>
News Reports
A Jehovah's Witness couple in Texas refused a
medically necessary blood transfusion for their newborn child. This is
a truly shocking development that deserves our attention. You can view
the story here
and you can discuss this development here.
Here is a transcript of the report:
Karen Borta (anchor): Tonight, a local
hospital is forced to go to court to provide urgent medical care for a
baby. Tracy Rowlett (anchor): This case pits
religious beliefs against the law, and it all started when twins were
born prematurely at Baylor Medical Center in Dallas. When their parents
would not consent to life-saving medical treatment, the hospital then
went to court. CBS 11's Jack Fink joins us live tonight with the
exclusive details. Jack? Jack Fink (reporter): Tracy,
court
documents show the couple would not consent to the treatment because it
would violate their religious beliefs. A judge has sided with the
hospital and ordered the treatments, but we've learned that one of the
twins has since died. Court records show Tara and Embre
Speciale were born on Valentine's Day. Each weighed less than two
pounds. But the next day, the Baylor Medical Center in Dallas filed a
petition in court, asking a judge to intervene. Doctors said the
children would likely need a transfusion of red blood cells, which
would enable the children's blood to carry sufficient oxygen to sustain
life. But the baby's parents are Jehovah's Witnesses, and it is against
the Jehovah's Witness religion to accept such treatment. Doctors told
the judge: "If the blood product treatment is delayed, there is a
significant risk of death or serious complications." Thomas Mayo, a
professor at SMU and a medical ethicist, couldn't comment on this
specific case, but says in general the law supports the hospital's
position. Thomas Mayo: What they're not entitled to
do under the law is to withhold blood transfusions from their minor
children. Jack Fink: In his order, Judge Robert Frost
prevented the babies' parents from disrupting or interfering with the
treatment. The Judge also ordered that Baylor Medical Center provide
all treatment that is reasonably necessary to stabilize the condition
or prevent death. The babies' parents didn't return our calls seeking
comment, and the hospital declined commenting on the case. Professor
Mayo says there is a simple rationale for the law. Thomas Mayo:
An adult is entitled to make
that decision for himself or herself, and that minor children have a
legal right to grow into adulthood and make that decision for
themselves when they are old enough. Jack Fink: Now
Jehovah's Witnesses we
spoke with say they have a very high regard for life and that they are
not anti-medicine. They say they try to find doctors who use treatments
other than blood transfusions.
We're live in Dallas tonight, Jack Fink, CBS 11 News.
India News – Siliguri Oct
9, 2004
The father of a
critically ill baby girl,
who took her away from the Siliguri Sadar
Hospital
to avoid a blood transfusion as it was against his faith was persuaded
by the
authorities that it was necessary to save the child's life.
The two and a half years old baby girl, Manorama Lakra, suffering from
acute
anemia diarrhea, was admitted to the Sadar Hospital
on October seven, Darjeeling Superintendent of Police Rajiv Mishra said
today.
The baby's father, Sanjay Lakra, a member of Jehovah's Witness, refused
when
doctors told him that she needed a blood transfusion to save her life
saying it
was against his faith. He then ran away with his baby girl, Mishra said.
The Jehovah's Witness is a Christian sect that denies many traditional
Christian doctrines and preaches the Second Coming.
Sanjay, a resident of Labour Bustee of the Bagdogra Tea Garden, and his
daughter were traced by the authorities that same evening and persuaded
to
return to the hospital, Mishra said, where Manorama was given a
transfusion.
She was given a second blood transfusion today, Dr A K Saha, under whom
she was
admitted said, adding that the baby girl's condition had improved.
The blood was provided by the North Bengal Voluntary Blood Donors
Forum, said
its Secretary Pijush Kanti Ray who together with the police
superintendent were
instrumental in convincing the father and bringing the baby back to the
hospital. PTI
Experiences
Thoughts expressed
are those of the individual and may not reflect the views of all
members or AJWRB.
From Ruth (McGill) Baker of
the Asheboro, NC
congregation in 2001
Two JW women, fleshy
sisters, by the name
of Louise and Bessie had found out they had developed leukemia after
some years
of suffering another blood disorder called hemochromatosis. Louise and Bessie by this
time were both in their early 80’s
when they found this out - they both had leukemia independently.
Treatment that could prolong
their lives would
require the use of blood transfusions which they both refused because
they were
devoted Jehovah’s Witnesses. Doctors
felt they could probably have lived quite a long time with other added
treatments combined with the blood transfusion treatments.
Bessie and Louise refused because of their
firm belief in the Watchtower’s policy on blood. To accept blood would
cause
them to face disfellowshipping from the congregation which they could
not bear -
not even to save their lives. The doctors told them it would hasten
their death
without blood transfusions. The doctor’s hands were tied.
The two sisters were originally
from Canada and had
lived in
the Asheboro, North Carolina area for many years
serving
faithfully all their lives. They had been second generation JW’s, and
proud of it. Bessie had been a pioneer
for nearly 30 plus years and finally married late in her life. Louise
had
served faithfully with her JW husband all her life. Both sisters had
even
resisted having children because of believing the end was always near. Now those lives were about to end due to a
WTS policy.
Louise died first in 1999 and
Bessie just months later in 2000. The
congregation I was in at the time cheered them on praising them for
being so
brave refusing blood transfusions. They lived less than 6 months after
developing
leukemia. These two sisters died
believing they were giving honor to the God they worshiped and the
religious
organization that promised them everlasting life because of their
willingness to
refuse blood transfusions.
From a Young Man named Matt
Schell of Rio Rancho, New
Mexico:
In 1969 I was born to parents whom were witnesses for about 4-5 years.
When I was 14, almost 15 I developed
a duodenal ulcer that positioned itself right on the main artery in the
GI
tract. So one morning I forgot to flush the toilet (in a lot of pain
and
lightheaded), and my mom discovered this enormous amount of blood I’d
lost. She
immediately took me to the doctor. At the doctor’s office, he withdrew
some
blood while I passed out 2 more times, and he sent me home. Much later
I found
out our Doctor sent me home so he could buy some time to get an
emergency court
order to force a transfusion because of my parents being Jehovah’s
Witnesses. He
knew it would take a blood transfusion to save my life. Now my mother
had been
a nurses aide for several years, and knew something was wrong, so she
was very
worried.
This is where I believe
Jehovah stepped
in. After we got home, and I was lying on the couch looking at my hands
and my
fingernails realizing they were totally white. My
mother had forgotten to pay the doctor, so
she had a JW neighbor keep an eye on me while she rushed back to pay
the
doctor. We had just moved into this house, so the doctor did not have
our new
address or phone number. He had planned on calling an ambulance as soon
as he
got the court order which was unknown to us. Had my mother not returned
immediately to pay the bill & update our address, the ambulance
would have
never found me.
At the hospital the
surgeon and team were awaiting us.
I overheard his
conversation with my parents and remember them saying distinctly, "We
do
not believe in blood transfusions, ask our son and he will tell you the
same
thing -we’re Jehovah’s Witnesses". So my parents told me what was going
on, and told me that I needed a blood transfusion, and reminded me of
what
Jehovah said about blood transfusions. I remember exactly what I was
thinking
as if it was 5 minutes ago. I thought, “If I accept a blood
transfusion,
Jehovah is going to kill me because of it”. So I said “no, I didn't
want one, I
didn't want to die.” And I remember the smile that came across mothers
face
when I said no. I could see my parents were so proud of me. Then the
surgeon
came in to talk to me, my parents to his back, he told me I needed a
blood transfusion,
but he would try to do what ever he could to make sure it didn't come
to that.
I remember the very nice 'gas man' as he put me to sleep for the
surgery. I was later told that they had
given me a
blood transfusion to save my life, otherwise I would have died.
When
coming to, I remember my mom telling me that the elders were there, and
how
everyone was so proud of me for my decision to refuse blood. That was
all they
could talk about for a good while. It
was even publicly announced from the platform of the decision I made to
refuse
blood transfusions! How brave I was, they all said. I heard my
mother say
she would never yell at me again. I was told how my decision convinced
a woman,
whom was studying, to dedicate herself. I never met this woman though
it was
told to me very enthusiastically.
After
the surgery I had several complications and ended up spending
about 3 months in the hospital. I started to question my decision the
day
another doctor had to feed me intravenously for 3 weeks, since I
couldn't keep
any food down. I became incredibly scared, and confused about the
forced blood
transfusion the hospital had given me. I
thought for sure Jehovah was going to kill me now, or at least was
punishing me
with these complications. The elders told me not to worry about that
because it
was the fact of my stand of refusing the blood transfusion, not that I
received
it, that Jehovah was looking at. My parents knew the truth and never
sued the
hospital, because the blood transfusion in truth had saved my life. The
congregation continued to believe my complications were a result of
forced blood
transfusions, rather than the truth of my true medical problems.
I
never thought about it after I became well. Then a couple of years ago
I realized it was that torturous decision that was causing some
post-traumatic
stress symptoms, and I sought therapy for 2 years. I finally took a
look at what
the Bible really said about blood. I studied with a brother for 6
months, and I
told him, I would never be able to accept the societies teaching on
transfusions. So I was informed I would never be allowed to be a
publisher, nor
be baptized. There were a few other things I questioned, but the main
issue was
blood.
To
disfellowship someone on this issue is not godly. I believe that
refusing to
baptize someone because of this issue is a form of pharmaceutical
judgment, and
borders on blaspheming God. It hurts that I am now considered an
apostate all
because of the blood issue. But I do know one thing, Jehovah and Jesus
still love
me no matter what I think, or believe. I believe Jehovah allowed me to
receive
a transfusion. Was it because of my faith in him, I don't know? That is
still
confusing to me even now.
But
thank you for letting me tell my
story, and I hope this will help someone decide for themselves if the
Watchtower
Bible Tract Society teachings on blood transfusions are really from
Jehovah, or
from men.
Matt
From another
of our readers an experience with name removed
to protect identity:
Thanks you for your informative
website. I am a former JW
who received four blood transfusions in February 2004.
I had a serious hemorrhage, with slim chance
of survival, after the birth of my fifth baby. My
hemoglobin fell below 50 and I received packed
red blood cells. Through
this process I have learned a lot, which I think a lot of JW’s are not
aware
of. The much touted 'blood expanders' that are allowed are often held
up as
being all that is needed in place of blood transfusions.
This is most certainly not the case. In fact,
what these blood expanders do is to dilute the blood that is left after
a
serious blood loss. This diluting makes the hemoglobin drop all the
lower, as
happened to me, so the red blood cells are needed all the more. Blood expanders were needed regardless of the
receipt or non-receipt of blood so avoiding them would not have avoided
the
need to blood products. Simply put, blood
expanders are not an answer.
I have five beautiful children and a
loving husband who need
their mother. I would not have been prepared to die for a teaching that
is
based on two scriptures that pertain to the EATING of blood. I can't imagine that God would give me these
children and then not want me to do all I could to be there for them.
I'm sure a lot of JW’s would also be
disappointed to know
that I have been tested for all the diseases and found free of any. They like to scare you with their exaggerated
stories of disease associated with blood. The
risk is very low in the first place when it comes to blood
transfusions thanks to modern science.
I could never let my child die for want of blood. Keep up the
good work all of you at AJWRB.ORG.
Reform
We regularly receive requests from individuals wanting to assist AJWRB
with our educat- ional work. We have prepared an entire section of
the web site with ideas and suggestions in this regard.
Additionally, you can help AJWRB by supporting
our efforts to inform and educate physicians and other health care
professionals. This work requires both time and money - resources
are necessary to push forward further reforms. If AJWRB has helped you
personally, please make a small donation
today.
Website - What's New
We have recovered lost images and updated the article:
We have added a site map
- but it is a work in progress.
Mail Bag
I have recently withdrawn my DPA (
the WTS version) from my medical file because I cannot agree with their
position on blood transfusions. I would, though, like to have one that
can give me the choices such as "end of life" and other advice's
concerning the cautions on the use of blood products. Would you
be able to advise me is there such a DPA that one can obtain? I
know on the AJWRB there is a proposed one but not in it's final form.
If you are in the United States, check with your "Secretary of State"
to see if they provide a "living will" and/or "Durable Power of
Attorney - Medical". You will need to add any provisions you believe
are necessary concerning the use of blood or blood products.
Despite the fact that my wife and I have separated
ourselves from the organization due to conscience, we do receive
occasional
news from those in our former hall. Recently, we got news that an elder
there
was diagnosed with a disorder that typically requires blood
transfusions as
treatment. With the help of AJWRB website I was able to clearly (in
spite of
not staying in touch or reading the magazines at all anymore) discuss
with his
daughter the options of use of hemoglobin products now allowed by the
society.
I have no idea if they will pursue this direction, but wanted to
express
appreciation that the info on the site is so well detailed and accurate
that it
allowed me to be of some assistance.
Thank you for your
diligent efforts here. May God
bless you and the staff at AJWRB.
Annonymous
My
name is Jose L. Ortiz,
Sr. and it is Ok if the entire human race knows about what I am
writing.
So, you have my permission to place my sister's name Mirta Soto Lebron
in your
list of known human sacrifices by Jehovah's Witnesses….My Sister, who
was a Jehovah's Witness for about 25 years, refused a blood
transfusion
and died November 16, 2004. I am a former Jehovah's Witness
myself and I know the basic false doctrine on the issue of
blood.
However, in the case of my sister, many details about the way the
Witnesses
handled or mishandled her so called "refusal" are highly
questionable.
In
my estimation, the
Witnesses have fouled up this case extremely negligently and even
daringly. It would take much time to explain this case and
frankly I
don't know how much good it would do, except for informational
purposes.
Therefore, I am limiting this email to only general information and a
request. Since your organization seems to deal with these issues
more
widely, I would like to inquire on whether or not you are affiliated
with
experienced trial Lawyers relating to Jehovah's Witnesses deaths due to
blood
issues. If not, do you know of any lawyers experienced with such
cases?
I believe our case is extremely unique and worthy of a good legal
look.
Thanking you I will await your response.
I am an elder…last week the circuit
overseer demonstrated to
the body of elders that someone whose blood is taken by the cell saver
can be
stored outside the body, taken into another room of the hospital and
then be
radiated in case of cancer. Here is the explanation that he offered: “You can see it as if you have cut off your
finger and go to the surgeon to fit it again on your hand. You see
it as a
part of you”. What did the Germans say, “wash my fur but don’t wet my
skin”?
Anonymous
I know first hand the
devastation caused by the watchtower society's stand on blood. My aunt
refused a blood transfusion several years ago and laid in a coma for 3
years before dying. I am writing to you to let you know that I
would like to get involved in this issue here in my own town. I would
personally like to visit the local hospitals and speak with the E.R
doctors about the JW stance on blood transfusions. I am willing to give
of my time for this cause, and
willing to help people going through these emotionally draining
circumstances.
See a discussion of what you can do in our section on Reform.
I am a Jehovah's Witness
looking to make an educated decision on
my bloodless medicine directives. I have found your site most
informative. I
would also like to see more reforms. I am not an elder, but I am in
good
standing.
Please don't be bitter with our
founding
elders…things were different back then and the WTS is now ready to
accept
modern advances. Now is not the time to recall lost lives, or keep an,
"I
told you so attitude."
Our congregation has recently had a visit
from a Liaison committee member
from Bethel.
He
told us of many JW's now with free conscious are using minor blood
fractions. He gave ne example of a young child having a liver
transplant, in a
bloodless surgery. Some other examples of witnesses having transfusions
of
their own blood that had been removed, treated, and returned in a
short
time, so as to keep a circulation going. This member also made us aware
of a
modern technology to omit the outer membrane of a blood cell and
harvest
the inner properties to form a minor fraction that could be taken
by one
who felt that it would not offend our God of love.
I wish our society would compromise the issue of
storing our own blood to use
on ourselves. It seems like the next easiest issue to reform. Perhaps
they are
afraid of changes coming too quickly.
If I were on your team, I would have the Liaison
member read from the bible,
Romans 13:1 and 2 where it says that we should be in subjection to the
authorities
of this system, Judges, educated scholars, doctors of medicine such as
yourselves.
Look at Mathew 23:1-3. It tells of how the religious
leaders of that day put an
unnecessary burden on the people, by adding to the limits of the law.
Look at
Mathew 23:23 It says, "you have disregarded the weightier matters of
the law namely justice and MERCY..." I hope this message
will help you. Remember, "attitude is everything."
Annonymous
Dear Brothers,
We wanted to call your attention to a new Jehovah's
Witnesses reform site. Like your own project, it is designed to
encourage change in the some of the organization's policies. Please
check it out. We hope some of you would appreciate it.
Yours truly,
I want to thank you
and the rest on AJWRB
for you past and current work on this blood topic. I currently
always ask
JWs how they can accept a blood fraction such as hemoglobin-based
products when
they are made out of large amounts of stored blood. I get 2
reactions,
one they agree with me that it is confusing and they can't accept the
product or get angry and say that the WTS says it is all right so
they are
going to accept it.
I have changed all my
medical instructions
so that I will accept all blood products if necessary and I now donate
my own
blood, popular universal donor that I am.
Thanks, Blondi
Crisis and
Intervention
We are attempting to put together an interview with Steven Hassan which we hope
to publish for our readers in our next issue.
The AJWRB newsletter is published several times each year to keep
members up to date on recent developments. Members are encouraged to
contact us with their thoughts, ideas and suggestions as well as to
submit content for publishing. While we cannot publish all material
received, we do carefully consider all submissions.
The Associated Jehovah's
Witnesses for Reform on Blood, is a diverse group of Witnesses from
over 25 countries, including elders and other organization officials,
Hospital Liaison Committee members, doctors and members of the general
public. All have volunteered their time and energies in an effort to
bring about an end to a tragic and misguided policy that has claimed
thousands of lives, many of them children.
"Never doubt that a small committed
group of citizens can change the world.
Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." Margret Mead
|